Polish Women Experiencing Infertility in the face of Legal and Ethical Dilemmas – A research report

Authors

  • Aleksandra A. Dembińska

Keywords:

infertility, polish law, ethical dilemmas

Abstract

The aim of the conducted studies was to learn about the opinions of women suffering from infertility regarding the most controversial issues connected with assisted reproduction, which are still being publicly discussed in Poland, despite the Act from 2015 regulating these issues. The studies compared opinions of women in different stages of experiencing infertility. The studied group comprised of 884 women: undergoing treatment, raising a child (born as a result of treatment or adopted), undergoing adoption procedures and those who decided to remain childless. The Attitudes Towards Bioethical Problems of Infertility Scale was an original tool used in the studies. Polish women have liberal views on most ethically controversial issues. The tested subjects had conservative views on the issue of IVF availability for homosexual couples (over 60% of subjects had conservative views) and IVF availability for unmarried couples (over 40% of subjects had conservative views). A comparison of opinions regarding the bioethical dilemmas of women on different stages of infertility revealed some interesting and statistically significant results (p < .001). Techniques where the partner’s cells are used were widely accepted (over 80%), contrary to techniques where a donor’s cells are used (accepted by approx. 40% of the subjects). Significant information concerning bioethical dilemmas on infertility treatment can be used to predict decisions concerning the course of infertility treatment. The gathered opinions constitute an important voice in the public debate on legal regulations in the area of bioethical issues connected with assisted reproduction.

References

Baor, L., & Blickstein, I. (2005). Psychosocial aspects of the direct path from infertility to the “instant family”: are all risks known. Harefuah, 144, 335-382.

Bielawska- Batorowicz, E. (1990). Psychologiczne aspekty rozpoznawania i leczenia niepłodności. Ginekologia Polska, 61, 629-633.

Bielawska-Batorowicz, E. (1998). Niepłodność i jej wybrane psychospołeczne aspekty. Ginekologia Polska, 69, 1116-1125.

Dembińska, A. (2012). Bioethical dilemmas of assisted reproduction in the opinions of Polish women in infertility treatment: a research report. Journal of Medical Ethics, 38, 731-734.

Dembińska, A. (2014). Psychological costs of life crisis in Polish women treated for infertility. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 1, 96-107.

Dembińska, A. (2015). Różnice w zakresie satysfakcji z życia u kobiet będących matkami po leczeniu niepłodności a matkami adopcyjnymi. In M. Kornaszewska-Polak (Ed.),

Wystarczająco dobre życie. Konteksty psychologiczne (pp. 105-117). Sosnowiec: Oficyna Wydawnicza „Humanitas”.

Dembińska, A. (2016a). Psychological determinants of life satisfaction in women undergoing infertility treatment. Health Psychology Report, 4 (2), 146-158.

Dembińska, A. (2016b). Childlessness - psychological consequences of decisions taken while experiencing infertility. Polish Journal of Applied Psychology, 14 (3), 9-26.

Dolińska, B. (2014). Bezdzietność. Perspektywa społeczno-kulturowa. Sopot: Smak Słowa.

Domitrz J., & Kulikowski M. (1997). Epidemiologia. In T. Pisarski & Szamatowicz (Eds.), Niepłodność (pp. 13-18). Warszawa: PZWL.

Gutowska, A. (2008). Rodzicielstwo adopcyjne. Wybrane aspekty funkcjonowania rodzin adopcyjnych. Lublin: Wyd. KUL.

Houghton, D., & Houghton, P. (1987). Coping whit Childlessness. London-Sydney: Unwin Peperback.

Jacobson, M.H., Chin, H.B., Mertens, A.C., Spencer, J.B., Fothergill, A., & Howards P.P. (2017). Research on Infertility: Definition Makes a Difference. Revisited. American Journal of Epidemiology, 187, 337-346.

Jan Paweł II (1999a). Ojcostwo i macierzyństwo w zamyśle Bożym. Przemówienie do uczestników Tygodnia Studiów nad małżeństwem i rodziną. 27 VIII 1999. L'Osservatore Romano, 11; https://opoka.org.pl/biblioteka/W/WP/jan_pawel_ii/przemowienia/ojcostwo_macierzynstwo_27051999.html.

Jan Paweł II (1999b). W obronie rodziny i jej praw. Przemówienie do uczestników zgromadzenia plenarnego Papieskiej Rady ds. Rodziny. 4 VI 1999; L'Osservatore Romano, 11; https://opoka.org.pl/biblioteka/W/WP/jan_pawel_ii/przemowienia/obrona_rodziny_04061999.html.

Journal of Laws of the Republic of Poland 2015, item 1087; Act on infertility treatment.

Kalus, A. (2003). Dynamika zmian obrazu siebie u małżonków adoptujących dziecko. In W świecie dziecka osieroconego i rodziny adopcyjnej, 97-108.

Makara-Studzińska, A., Wdowiak, A. (2009). Psychologiczna sytuacja kobiety niepłodnej. In M. Makara-Studzińska, G. Iwanowicz-Palus (Eds.), Psychologia w położnictwie i ginekologii. Warszawa: PZWL, 137-153.

McCarthy, M.P. (2008). Women’s lived experience of infertility after unsuccessful medical intervention. Journal of Midwifery and Women’s Health, 53, 319-24.

McGrath, J.M.S., Zukowsky, K., Baker, B. (2010). Parenting after infertility: issues for families and infants. MCN. The American Journal of Maternal Child Nursing 35 (3), 156-164.

Milewska, E. (2003). Charakterystyka motywacji do adopcji dziecka na podstawie badań kandydatów na rodziców adopcyjnych. In A. Kalus (Ed.), W świecie dziecka osieroconego i rodziny adopcyjnej. Opole: Wyd. Wydziału Teologicznego Uniwersytetu Opolskiego, 163-176.

Motyka, M., & Golańska, Z. (1982). Psychologiczne problemy małżeństw niepłodnych. Ginekologia Polska, 10, 713-716.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-01

How to Cite

Dembińska, A. A. (2017). Polish Women Experiencing Infertility in the face of Legal and Ethical Dilemmas – A research report. Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis Studia Psychologica, 10(1), 61–68. Retrieved from https://studia-psychologica.uken.krakow.pl/article/view/5640

Issue

Section

Articles