Testowanie niemieckiej wersji Kwestionariusza Postrzegania Czasu Zimbardo (ZTPI)
Słowa kluczowe:
Kwestionariusz Postrzegania Czasu, trafność, niemieckie tłumaczenie, narzędzie diagnostyczneAbstrakt
W niniejszym badaniu oceniono psychometryczne właściwości ZTPI na niemieckiej próbie N = 160 osób. Do pomiaru różnych rodzajów perspektywy czasu wykorzystano pięć skal: Przeszłość-Negatywna, Teraźniejszość-Hedonistyczna, Przyszłość, Przeszłość-Pozytywna oraz Teraźniejszość-Fatalistyczna. W oparciu o wyniki badań powtórzonych, za wyjątkiem skali badającej orientację przyszłościową, niemiecka wersja kwestionariusza ZTPI okazała się wewnętrznie spójna i rzetelna. Rzetelność ponownego badania dla podpróby (N = 25) wskazuje na stabilny pomiar skal. Nie udało się w sposób zadowalający replikować struktury czynnikowej opracowanej przez Zimbardo i Boyda (1999). Korelacje z wynikami konceptualnie powiązanych testów (IPC, HAKEMP i HEIPI) pokazują znaczny stopień trafności konstruktu w ramach klasycznej teorii testów. Nie powiodło się jednak dopasowanie wyników do modelu Rascha.
Bibliografia
Anagnostopoulos, F., & Griva, F. (2012). Exploring time perspective in Greek young adults: Validation of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory and relationships with mental health indicators. Social Indicators Research, 106(1), 41-59.
Apostolidis, T., & Fieulaine, N. (2004). Validation française de l’échelle de temporalité. The Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI). Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée, 54, 207-217.
Boniwell, I., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2003). Time to find the right balance. The Psychologist, 16(3), 129-131.
Carelli, M., Wiberg, B., & Wiberg, M. (2011). Development and construct validation of the Swedish Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory. European Journal Of Psychological Assessment, 27(4), 220-227.
Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54, 165-181.
Cottle, T. J. (1976). Perceiving Time: A Psychological Investigation with Men and Women. New York: Wiley.
Desmyter, F., & De Raedt, R. (2012). The relationship between time perspective and subjective well-being of older adults. Psychologica Belgica, 52, 19-38.
DeVolder, M., & Lens, W. (1982). Academic achievement and future time perspective as a cognitive motivational concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 566-571.
Funke, J., Reuschenbach, B., Pfann, H., Roch, K., & Ziegler, N. (2003). Heidelberger Planungsinventar (HeiPi). Unpublished manuscript, Universität Heidelberg.
Kolesovs, A. (2002). The relation between time perspective and locus of control in high school students. Baltic Journal of Psychology, 3(2), 7-19.
Kolesovs, A. (2005). Time perspective of Latvian and Russian (ethnic minority) high school students in Riga and Latgale. Baltic Journal of Psychology, 6(1), 5-20.
Krampen, G. (1981). IPC-Fragebogen zu Kontrollüberzeugungen (Locus of control). [German version of the IPC scales from Hanna Levenson]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
Kuhl, J. (1994). Action versus state orientation: Psychometric properties of the Action-Control-Scale (ACS-90). In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Volition and personality: Action versus state orientation (pp. 47-56). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
Lewin, K. (1951). Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers. New York: Harper. Liniauskaitė, A., & Kairys, A. (2009). The Lithuanian version of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI). Psichologija, 40, 66-87.
Nurmi, J.-E. (1994). The development of future orientation in life span context. In Z. Zaleski (Ed.), Psychology of future orientation (pp. 63-74). Lublin: Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL.
Nuttin, J. R. (1985). Future Time Perspective and Motivation: Theory and Research Method. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
O’Donnell, D. A., Schwab-Stone, M. E., & Muyeed, A. Z. (2002). Multidimensional resilience in urban children exposed to community violence. Child Development, 73, 1265-1282.
Rappaport, H. (1990). Marking Time. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Rost, J., Carstensen, C. H., & von Davier, M. (1999). Sind die Big Five Rasch-skalierbar? [Are the Big Five Rasch-scalable?] Diagnostica, 45, 119-127.
Ryack, K. (2012). Evidence that time perspective factors depend on the group: Factor analyses of the CFC and ZTPI scales with professional financial advisors. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 723-727. Doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.12.039.
Sircova, A. A., Mitina, O. V., Boyd, J. J., Davydova, I. S., Zimbardo, P. G., Nepryaho, T. L., & Yasnaya, V. A. (2007). The phenomenon of time perspective across different cultures: Review of researches using ZTPI Scale. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 4, 19-31.
Strathman, A., Gleicher, F., Boninger, D., & Edwards, C. (1994). The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 742-752.
Trommsdorff, G. (1994). Future time perspective and control orientation: Social conditions and consequences. In Z. Zaleski (Ed.), Psychology of Future Orientation (pp. 39-62). Lublin: Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL.
Wohlford, P. (1966). Extension of personal time, affective states, and expectation of personal death. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 559-566.
Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1271-1288.
Zuckerman, M. (1994). Behavioral Expressions and Biosocial Bases of Sensation Seeking. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Apostolidis, T., & Fieulaine, N. (2004). Validation française de l’échelle de temporalité. The Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI). Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée, 54, 207-217.
Boniwell, I., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2003). Time to find the right balance. The Psychologist, 16(3), 129-131.
Carelli, M., Wiberg, B., & Wiberg, M. (2011). Development and construct validation of the Swedish Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory. European Journal Of Psychological Assessment, 27(4), 220-227.
Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54, 165-181.
Cottle, T. J. (1976). Perceiving Time: A Psychological Investigation with Men and Women. New York: Wiley.
Desmyter, F., & De Raedt, R. (2012). The relationship between time perspective and subjective well-being of older adults. Psychologica Belgica, 52, 19-38.
DeVolder, M., & Lens, W. (1982). Academic achievement and future time perspective as a cognitive motivational concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 566-571.
Funke, J., Reuschenbach, B., Pfann, H., Roch, K., & Ziegler, N. (2003). Heidelberger Planungsinventar (HeiPi). Unpublished manuscript, Universität Heidelberg.
Kolesovs, A. (2002). The relation between time perspective and locus of control in high school students. Baltic Journal of Psychology, 3(2), 7-19.
Kolesovs, A. (2005). Time perspective of Latvian and Russian (ethnic minority) high school students in Riga and Latgale. Baltic Journal of Psychology, 6(1), 5-20.
Krampen, G. (1981). IPC-Fragebogen zu Kontrollüberzeugungen (Locus of control). [German version of the IPC scales from Hanna Levenson]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
Kuhl, J. (1994). Action versus state orientation: Psychometric properties of the Action-Control-Scale (ACS-90). In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Volition and personality: Action versus state orientation (pp. 47-56). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
Lewin, K. (1951). Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers. New York: Harper. Liniauskaitė, A., & Kairys, A. (2009). The Lithuanian version of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI). Psichologija, 40, 66-87.
Nurmi, J.-E. (1994). The development of future orientation in life span context. In Z. Zaleski (Ed.), Psychology of future orientation (pp. 63-74). Lublin: Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL.
Nuttin, J. R. (1985). Future Time Perspective and Motivation: Theory and Research Method. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
O’Donnell, D. A., Schwab-Stone, M. E., & Muyeed, A. Z. (2002). Multidimensional resilience in urban children exposed to community violence. Child Development, 73, 1265-1282.
Rappaport, H. (1990). Marking Time. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Rost, J., Carstensen, C. H., & von Davier, M. (1999). Sind die Big Five Rasch-skalierbar? [Are the Big Five Rasch-scalable?] Diagnostica, 45, 119-127.
Ryack, K. (2012). Evidence that time perspective factors depend on the group: Factor analyses of the CFC and ZTPI scales with professional financial advisors. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 723-727. Doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.12.039.
Sircova, A. A., Mitina, O. V., Boyd, J. J., Davydova, I. S., Zimbardo, P. G., Nepryaho, T. L., & Yasnaya, V. A. (2007). The phenomenon of time perspective across different cultures: Review of researches using ZTPI Scale. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 4, 19-31.
Strathman, A., Gleicher, F., Boninger, D., & Edwards, C. (1994). The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 742-752.
Trommsdorff, G. (1994). Future time perspective and control orientation: Social conditions and consequences. In Z. Zaleski (Ed.), Psychology of Future Orientation (pp. 39-62). Lublin: Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL.
Wohlford, P. (1966). Extension of personal time, affective states, and expectation of personal death. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 559-566.
Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1271-1288.
Zuckerman, M. (1994). Behavioral Expressions and Biosocial Bases of Sensation Seeking. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pobrania
Opublikowane
2013-12-01
Jak cytować
Reuschenbach, B., Funke, J., Drevensek, A., & Ziegler, N. (2013). Testowanie niemieckiej wersji Kwestionariusza Postrzegania Czasu Zimbardo (ZTPI). Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis Studia Psychologica, 6(1), 16–29. Pobrano z https://studia-psychologica.uken.krakow.pl/article/view/5587
Numer
Dział
Artykuły
